Press Releases





January 17, 2018, Port Angeles, WA – Two bills being considered in the Washington State Legislature expand military control of private development and land use planning in Washington State, violating several of the most basic and important provisions of the Washington and United States Constitutions.


HB 2341, now in the House Committee on Environment, and SB 6456, a companion bill in the Senate, prohibit local governments from allowing incompatible development in the vicinity of a military installation. Any commander of any military installation operated by the United States armed services within or adjacent to Washington State is given sole authority to determine whether incompatibility exists.


The bills prioritize all military uses, whether they improve or damage the State's economy, over any private, tax-paying, industrial, agricultural, residential or other development. They amend current legislation by:


1. making the prohibition of incompatible developments mandatory;

2. extending the prohibition to lands that are not adjacent to the military installation;

3. applying the prohibition to the benefit of any military installation, no matter how small;

4. allowing the State Department of Commerce to spend up to $25 million every two years to acquire property to eliminate an existing incompatible use, or to increase the availability of housing affordable to enlisted military personnel.


The bills imply that incompatibility exists if development "may interfere" with the installation's ability to carry out its "current or future mission requirements" and suggest the prohibition extends as far away from the military installation as the installation's present or future mission extends. This could result in the prohibition applying to almost any land within Washington State, whether the incompatibility arises from a current mission, or a mission proposed to begin years into the future.


“If a military installation's mission is to train helicopter crews, the bill could prohibit development anywhere along the flight path from launch to landing, depending solely on the military commander's judgment. Where a military mission is to provide howitzer training, the prohibition could apply as far away from the installation as explosive sounds could create an incompatibility, again depending solely on the military commander's judgment,” explained Ron Richards, Chair of Save The Olympic Peninsula.


By handing United States military commanders control of the State's land use powers, the bills violate Article 1, Section 18, of the Washington State Constitution that states, “The military shall be in strict subordination to civil power,” as well as violating the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, that reserves to the States the powers not granted to the federal government or prohibited by it to the States. Sacrosanct among the powers reserved to the States is the power to adopt local zoning regulations.


"By outlawing all land uses that might be incompatible with present or future missions of United States military installations, the bills accomplish an 'inverse condemnation' of property, and expose the State to paying for that property in litigation. This is especially egregious given that Washington state is in default of its 'paramount duty' to fund basic education," Richards emphasized.




Growler Noise Study Debunked


June 20, 2016, Port Angeles, WA.  U.S. Rep. Derek Kilmer recently announced that he has secured a $2 million amendment to the 2017 Department of Defense’s $582.7 billion Appropriations Bill for "research that would help lower engine noise on Super Hornets and Growler aircraft that are used in current military operations."


Save The Olympic Peninsula questions this action as it is not only a very weak effort, it is simply not a good idea. Any sound improvement that could have been accomplished for that amount of money would have been achieved long ago.


In addition, the Navy has already spent millions of dollars on a study and has taken the position that any measures to reduce sound would reduce efficiency, speed, and probably combat capabilities. As noted in the Navy’s own “Final Jet Engine Noise Report”, published in 2009, "Increased engine performance is derived from higher cycle temperatures and pressures, which produces higher jet velocities resulting in increased noise.”


“The American public is smart enough to know that yet another study of an aircraft that costs us $68 million per machine is just a ruse in an election year,” said Dr. Beverly Goldie, President of Save The Olympic Peninsula.


STOP has long maintained that the jet noise impacting our forests and residential neighborhoods would be alleviated if the Navy’s attack jet training took place at the military training facility in Mountain Home Idaho, rather than on the Olympic Peninsula.



It's Time for Our Politicians to Wake Up


May 10, 2016, Port Angeles, WA.  The recently released 2015 National Park visitation statistics are bad news for Olympic National Park and the Olympic Peninsula’s most important tourism industry. With almost perfect weather during the 2015 visitor season, and with a booming Puget Sound economy, there can be little doubt of what contributed to these dismal figures. Most probably they can be traced to the adverse impact of the Navy’s present and planned use of the Park’s airspace for electronic warfare training with the noisiest jet in its fleet, the EA-18G Growler.


Olympic dropped from being the sixth most visited National Park in 2014 to being the seventh most visited National Park in 2015.  Its visitor count increased by only 19,889, or 0.6 percent, from 3,243,872 to 3,263,761.  (Click here to see the comparisons.) In both absolute numbers and percentages, these were the worst statistics among the top ten most visited National Parks from 2014.  Percentage wise, Rocky Mountain National Park’s 21 percent increase was best.  Number wise, Grand Canyon National Park’s increase of 763,965 visitors (16%) was best.


In this interconnected world, the news that Olympic is the site of electronic warfare training with the loudest jets in the military emitting harmful electromagnetic radiation has spread far and wide.  Web sites dedicated to hikers, backpackers, birdwatchers, and nature lovers have warned their readers of what’s happening to Olympic.  Gordon Hempton of One Square Inch of Silence fame, and Mountain Man Mick Dodge have justifiably warned their followers of the grave danger the Navy’s activities pose to the wilderness experience that Olympic National Park should be.  The United Nations has expressed concern that the United States is not living up to its obligations under the World Heritage Convention to protect the Park as a World Heritage Site.


That both sound and electromagnetic radiation can impair the attractiveness of National Parks is well known.  The National Park Service’s Directors Order #47, Soundscape Preservation and Noise Management, states:


Intrusive sounds are also a matter of concern to park visitors. As was reported to the U.S. Congress in the "Report on the Effects of Aircraft Overflights on the National Park System," a system-wide survey of park visitors revealed that nearly as many visitors come to national parks to enjoy the natural soundscape (91 percent) as come to view the scenery (93 percent).


The public’s fear of electromagnetic radiation, whether it be from x-ray machines, power lines, smart meters, cell phones, or whatever source, whether real or imagined, is so well known as to be a matter of common knowledge.


It is time to recognize the early warning signs that these visitation figures provide.  With the Olympic Peninsula’s economy so dependent on the National Park, it is past the time for our elected representatives, on the basis of economics alone, to demand an end to the Navy’s misuse of the Olympic Peninsula for its electronic  warfare training purposes.